| The attack of the British destroyers was carried out with
						great gallantry and determination, and having frustrated the enemy's torpedo
						attack on the 3rd Battle Cruiser Squadron, Commander Loftus Jones turned his
						division to regain his position on our battle cruisers. At this moment three
						German vessels came into sight out of the mist and opened a heavy fire, further
						disabling the Shark and causing many casualties on board; Commander Loftus
						Jones was amongst those wounded. Lieut.- Commander J. 0. Barren, commanding the
						Acasta, came to the assistance of the Shark, but Commander Loftus Jones refused
						to imperil a second destroyer, and directed the Acasta to leave him. The Shark
						then became the target for the German ships and destroyers. Commander Loftus
						Jones, who was assisting to keep the only undamaged gun in action, ordered the
						last torpedo to be placed in the tube and fired; but whilst this ,was being
						done the torpedo was hit by a shell and exploded, causing many casualties.
						Those gallant officers and men in the Shark who still survived continued to
						fight the only gun left in action, the greatest heroism being exhibited. The
						captain was now wounded again, his right leg being taken off by a shell; but he
						still continued to direct the fire, until the condition of the Shark and the
						approach of German destroyers made it probable that the ship would fall into
						the hands of the enemy, when he gave orders for her to be sunk, countermanding
						this order shortly afterwards on realising that her remaining gun could still
						be fought. A little later, the ship was hit by two torpedoes, and sank with her
						colours flying. Only six survivors were picked up the next morning by a Danish
						steamer. In recognition of the great gallantry displayed, the whole of the
						survivors were awarded the Distinguished Service Medal. Their names are: W. C.
						R. Griffin, Petty Officer; C. Filleul, Stoker Petty Officer; C. C. Hope, A.B.;
						C. H. Smith, A.B.; T. O. G. Howell, A.B.; T. W. Swan, Stoker.  At this point it is well to turn to the proceedings of our
						advanced cruiser line, which at 5 P.M. was about 16 miles ahead of the Battle
						Fleet, the latter being at that time in Lat. 57.24 N., Long. 5.12 E., steering
						S.E. by S. at 20 knots. It should be noted that, owing to decreasing
						visibility, .which .was stated in reports from the cruisers to be slightly
						above six miles, the cruisers on the starboard flank had closed in and were
						about six miles apart by 5.30 P.M. The 3rd Battle Cruiser Squadron was about 16
						miles due east of the advanced cruiser line, but was steering more to the
						southward on a converging course at a speed of about five knots faster.  At 5.40 P.M. firing was heard ahead by the cruiser line, and
						shortly afterwards ships were seen from the Minotaur to be emerging from the
						mist. Rear-Admiral Heath, the senior officer of the cruiser line, had recalled
						the ships of the 2nd Cruiser Squadron on hearing the firing and had ordered
						them to form single line ahead on the Minotaur. He then made the signal to
						engage the enemy, namely, the ships in sight ahead; but before fire was opened
						they replied to his challenge and were identified as the ships of the 3rd
						Battle Cruiser Squadron, engaged with the enemy's light cruisers and steering
						to the westward.  At 5.47 P.M. the Defence, with the Warrior astern,
						sighted on a S. by W. bearing (namely, on the starboard bow) three or four
						enemy light cruisers, and course was altered three points to port, bringing
						them nearly on a beam bearing. Rear-Admiral Sir Robert Arbuthnot, in the
						Defence, then signalled "Commence fire." Each ship fired three salvoes
						at a three-funnelled cruiser. The salvoes fell short, and the Defence altered
						course to starboard, brought the enemy first ahead, and then to a bearing on
						the port bow, evidently with the intention of closing. The latter alteration of
						course .was made at 6.1 P.M., and by this time projectiles from the light
						cruisers were falling in close proximity to the Defence and the
						Warrior. These ships opened fire with their pout guns at 6.5 P.M. and
						shortly afterwards passed close across the bows of the Lion from port to
						starboard. One light cruiser, probably the Wiesbaden, was hit by the second
						salvoes of both ships, appeared to be badly crippled, and nearly stopped. Our
						ships continued to close her until within 5,500 yards. From about 6.10 P.M.
						onwards they had come under fire of guns of heavy calibre from the enemy's
						battle cruisers, but Sir Robert Arbuthnot, as gallant and determined an officer
						as ever lived, was evidently bent on finishing off his opponent, and held on,
						probably not realising in the gathering smoke and mist that the enemy's heavy
						ships were at fairly close range. At about 6.16 P.M. the Defence was hit
						by two salvoes in quick succession, which caused her magazines to blow up and
						the ship disappeared. The loss of so valuable an officer as Sir Robert
						Arbuthnot and so splendid a ship's company as the officers and men of the
						Defence was a heavy blow. The Warrior was very badly damaged by
						shell fire, her engine-rooms being flooded; but Captain Molteno was able to
						bring his ship out of action, having first seen the Defence disappear.
						From diagrams made in the Warrior it appears that the German battle
						cruisers turned 16 points (possibly with a view either to close their Battle
						Fleet or to come to the aid of the disabled Wiesbaden), engaged the
						Defence and Warrior, and then turned back again. This supposition
						is confirmed by sketches taken on board the Duke of Edinburgh at the
						same time. Owing to the smoke and the mist, however, it was difficult to state
						exactly what occurred. From the observations on board the Warrior, it is
						certain that the visibility was much greater in her direction from the enemy's
						line than it was in the direction of the enemy from the Warrior.
						Although the Defence and Warrior were being hit
						frequently, those on board the Warrior could only see the ships
						firing at them very indistinctly, and it is probable that the low visibility
						led to Sir Robert Arbuthnot not appreciating that he was at comparatively short
						range from the German battle cruisers until he was already under an
						overwhelming fire.
 The Warrior passed astern of the
						5th Battle Squadron at the period when the steering gear of the Warspite
						had become temporarily disabled.
 The Duke of Edinburgh, the ship next to
						the west-, ward of the Defence and the Warrior in
						the cruiser screen, had turned to close these ships when they became engaged
						with the enemy's light cruisers in accordance ,with a signal from the
						Defence. The Duke of Edinburgh joined in the engagement,
						but, on sighting the Lion on her starboard bow, did not follow the other
						ships across the bows of the battle cruisers, as to do so would have seriously
						incommoded these vessels; she turned to port to a parallel course and
						eventually joined the 2nd Cruiser Squadron.
 The Black Prince ,was observed from the
						Duke of Edinburgh to turn some 12 points to port at the same time that
						the Duke of Edinburgh turned, but her subsequent movements are not
						clear; the German accounts of the action stated that the Black Prince
						was sunk by gun fire at the same time as the Defence, but she was
						not seen to be in action at this time by any of our vessels, and, moreover, a
						wireless signal, reporting a submarine in sight and timed 8.48 P.M., was
						subsequently received from her. It is probable that the Black Prince
						passed to the rear of the Battle Fleet at about 6.30 P.M., and that during the
						night she found herself close to one of the German battle squadrons, and was
						sunk then by superior gunfire. In support of this theory, the German account
						mentions that a cruiser of the " Cressy " type was sunk in that manner
						during the night. None of the ships of this class was present during the
						engagement, but the Black Prince might well have been mistaken for a
						ship of this type in the circumstances.  We left the 3rd Battle Cruiser Squadron at
						about 6.10 P.M. at the termination of their engagement with enemy light
						cruisers, turning to avoid torpedoes fired at them. At about this time
						Rear-Admiral Hood sighted the Lion and the 1st Battle Cruiser Squadron,
						and at about 6.16 P.M. hoisted the signal to his squadron to form single line
						ahead, and turned to take station ahead of the Lion and to engage the
						hostile battle cruisers, which at 6.20 P.M. .were sighted at a range of 8,600
						yards.  A furious engagement ensued for a few minutes,
						and the fire of the squadron was judged by those on board the Invincible
						to be very effective. Rear-Admiral Hood, who was on the bridge of the
						Invincible with Captain Cay, hailed Commander Dannreuther, the gunnery
						officer in the fore control, at about 6.30 P.M., saying, " Your firing is very
						good. Keep at it as quickly as you can; every shot is telling." At about 6.34
						P.M. the Invincible, which had already been hit more than once by heavy
						shell .without appreciable damage, was struck in "Q" turret. The shell
						apparently burst inside the turret, as Commander Dannreuther saw the roof blown
						off. A very heavy explosion followed immediately, evidently caused by the
						magazine blowing up, and the ship broke in half and sank at once, only two
						officers, including Commander Dannreuther, and four men being subsequently
						picked up by the destroyer Badger. The British Navy sustained a most
						serious loss in Rear-Admiral the Hon. Horace Hood, one of the most
						distinguished of our younger flag officers, and in Captain Cay and the officers
						and men of his flagship. The difficulties of distinguishing enemy ships even at
						the close range of this engagement is revealed by the fact that the officers in
						the Invincible and Indomitable were under the impression that
						they were engaging battle cruisers, whilst officers in the Inflexible,
						stationed between these two ships in the line, reported that her fire was being
						directed at a battleship of the "Kaiser" or "König" class, and that only
						one ship could be seen.  Just before the loss of the Invincible,
						the 3rd Light Cruiser Squadron, commanded by Rear-Admiral Napier, had carried
						out an effective torpedo attack on the enemy's battle cruisers; both the light
						cruisers Falmouth and Yarmouth fired torpedoes at the leading
						battle cruiser. It was thought that one of the torpedoes hit its mark, as a
						heavy under-water explosion was felt at this time.  After the loss of the Invincible, the
						Inflexible was left as leader of the line, and as soon as the wreck of
						the Invincible had been passed, course was altered two points to
						starboard to close the enemy ships, which were disappearing in the mist. A
						further turn to starboard for the same purpose was made, but at this time, 6.50
						P.M., the battle cruisers being clear of the leading battleships (which .were
						bearing N.N.W. three miles distant), Sir David Beatty signalled the 3rd Battle
						Cruiser Squadron to prolong the line of the battle cruisers, and the
						Inflexible and Indomitable took station astern of the New
						Zealand.  The course of events can now be traced with
						accuracy. The Chester .with the 3rd Battle Cruiser Squadron, which by
						5.40 P.M. had got ahead of the Battle Fleet's cruiser screen, encountered some
						of the light cruisers composing the enemy's screen and engaged them, and, in
						doing so, drew the enemy's light cruisers towards the 3rd Battle Cruiser
						Squadron, which, with the Canterbury and destroyers, turned to about
						W.N.W. to assist the Chester. and to engage the enemy vessels.  In the course of this movement a destroyer
						attack was made by four British destroyers on the enemy's light cruisers. This
						attack was apparently thought by the Germans to come from the flotillas with
						the Battle Fleet, as far as can be judged from their report of the action; the
						ships of the 3rd Battle Cruiser Squadron .were undoubtedly mistaken by their
						vessels for the van of our Battle Fleet, since mention is made in the German
						report of the British Battle Fleet having been sighted at this time by the
						German light forces, steering in a westerly or north-westerly direction. The
						mistaken idea caused the van of the High Sea Fleet to turn off to starboard.
						 So far from our Battle Fleet being on a
						westerly course at this time, the fact is that our Battle Fleet held its
						south-easterly course before, through, and immediately subsequent to
						deployment, gradually hauling round afterwards, first through south to
						south-west, and then to west, but it was not until 8 P.M. that a
						"westerly course was being steered.  The only point that is not clear is the
						identity of the light cruiser engaged and seriously damaged by the 3rd Battle
						Cruiser Squadron. The ship engaged by the Defence and Warrior was
						apparently the Wiesbaden. It seems to be impossible that the 3rd Battle
						Cruiser Squadron engaged the same vessel, and it is more likely to have been
						another light cruiser in the enemy's screen. The two engagements took place at
						almost the same time, the 3rd Battle Cruiser Squadron opening fire at 5.55
						P.M., and the Defence and the Warrior (the 1st Cruiser Squadron)
						commencing their engagement .with the starboard guns at about 5.50 P.M. and
						continuing it ;with the port guns at 6.5 P.M. It is hardly possible, even in
						the conditions of low visibility that prevailed, that the two squadrons could
						have been engaging the same vessel. Mention should be made here of the work of the
						destroyer Onslow, commanded by Lieut.-Commander J. C. Tovey, which at
						6.5 P.M. .sighted an enemy's light cruiser in a position on the bows of the
						Lion and favourable for torpedo attack on that ship. The Onslow
						closed and engaged the light cruiser with gunfire at ranges between 2,000 and
						4,000 yards, and then, although severely damaged by shell fire, succeeded in
						closing a German battle cruiser to attack with torpedoes; she was struck by a
						heavy shell before more than one torpedo could be fired. Lieut.-Commander Tovey
						thought that his order to fire all torpedoes had been carried out, and finding
						that this was not the case, closed the light cruiser and fired a torpedo at
						her, and then sighting the Battle Fleet fired the remaining torpedoes at
						battleships. The Onslow's engines then stopped, but the damaged
						destroyer Defender, Lieut.-Commander Palmer, closed her at 7.15 P.M. and
						took her in tow under a heavy fire, and, in spite of bad weather during the
						night and the damaged condition of both destroyers, brought her back to home
						.waters, transferring her on June 1st to the care of a tug.  |